Tactical & Survival

Single-Layer Ski Goggle Lens Still Performs: Oakley Line Miner Pro Review

“Just one more hit!” I yell over my shoulder. I’m out of breath, sprinting up a knee-deep bootpack, my heart rate spiking through the roof. The lift I need to catch to get out of this back bowl is minutes from closing, and I don’t want the ski patrol to chew me out. It’s a stormy, wet afternoon, too, and getting stuck back here might be a death sentence.

But more importantly, I haven’t landed my front 360 yet, as evidenced by my two bomb holes in the landing. My buddies are at the bottom of the cliff band, impatiently waiting. I don’t have time to baby my goggles — Oakley’s new Line Miner Pro — and a thin layer of condensation is forming at my brow. Damn, I think; worried the fog will impede my already marginal performance. Will I have to send it goggle-less?

Those conditions and parameters would test any goggle’s limits. But the Line Miner Pro isn’t just any goggle. It’s a semi-frameless spin-off of the popular cylindrical Line Miner with a reimagined version of Oakley’s Switchlock lens interchangeability system.

But what sets it apart from the pack is the single-layer lens. Most modern goggles sport double-layer lenses to reduce fogging. 

The condensation of this single-layer lens didn’t get unmanageable as I hiked back up the hill. I huffed and puffed, clipped back in, dropped, spun, and stomped the landing. We ripped down to the chairlift, only to find what we feared. The chair was closed, and the stern, disappointed lift ops were staring us down.

Sorry, gents. I had to get that three. And besides, these goggles needed testing.

In short: Oakley’s new Line Miner Pro is a cylindrical goggle featuring an updated version of Oakley’s Switchlock lens technology and a single-layer lens. The semi-frameless design is ultra-stylish and compatible with a variety of helmets. I did have some issues with fogging and condensation, but the field of view and optical clarity scored high marks. If the speed of lens swapping is your top priority, look elsewhere. But for fans of Oakley’s Prizm lenses who have been waiting for a better (albeit far from perfect) interchangeable lens system, these goggles are a solid choice.

If you’re shopping for goggles, compare the Oakley Line Miner Pro to those on GearJunkie’s guide to the Best Ski Goggles.


  • Stylish

  • Excellent optical clarity for a cylindrical lens

  • Expansive peripherals

  • Compatible with a variety of helmets


  • Some fogging issues

  • Lens interchangeability system is challenging, especially with gloves on

Oakley Line Miner Pro Review

Equipped with a single-layer lens and a reimagined version of Oakley’s Switchlock lens interchangeability system, the Line Miner Pro seemed to me — a longtime fan of the brand and a self-admitted goggle nerd — both curious and a long time coming.

It’s a curious release because most modern goggles sport double-layer lenses to reduce fogging. It felt overdue because Oakley has, at least of late, been lacking a reliable goggle with a decent interchangeable lens system that comes with a spare lens. Needless to say, I was stoked to put this new offering under the microscope for GearJunkie.

Where Does the Line Miner Pro Sit in the Oakley Line?

At $300, the Line Miner Pro is currently the most expensive snow goggle in Oakley’s lineup. However, it’s also one of the only snow goggles Oakley sells that comes with a spare lens.

The next most expensive goggle is the Flight Deck, a spherical goggle that retails for $75 less and doesn’t include a spare lens.

To be clear, most of the goggles in the Oakley lineup that don’t come with a spare lens do still have interchangeable lenses. But these systems require some elbow grease and focus, which isn’t ideal on the chairlift or at the top of a backcountry line with your gloves on. If you’re looking to replace a scratched lens, fine. But swapping on the hill? Not ideal.

That said, if you have Oakleys, chances are you’re rocking a two-goggle quiver (or more).

One of the reasons that the Line Miner Pro was so anticipated is that it is promised as a one-goggle quiver with multiple lens options and an easy lens interchangeability system. While Oakley has offered goggles with lens interchangeability systems in the past, they haven’t really been in the conversation with the likes of Anon and Smith as of late — at least in the interchangeable lens category.

Successes of the Line Miner Pro: Style, Fit, Field of View, and Optics

Style: Through the Roof

My favorite aspect of this goggle highlights the same attribute that so many skiers and snowboarders love about the original Line Miner (and, to be honest, Oakleys in general). Style.

Oakley designers essentially took a chisel to the original Line Miner. The brand kept the general lens shape (cylindrical, with that iconic indent in the center of the brow). But it also edited the robust frame down to a semi-frameless design.

The result looks sharp and sleek, with clean, contemporary lines. Personally, I love how the lens sits flush with the minimalistic frame. I tested a matte black mode. From a board length or two away, you can’t even really see the frame at all. As far as style points, Oakley maxed out the category in my book.

Fit: Strong Compatibility With Numerous Helmets

Like the original Line Miner, the Pro offers skiers and snowboarders excellent helmet compatibility. I tested the Pro with a smattering of helmets, including the Smith Method Pro MIPS, POC Obex BC, Flaxta Deep Space MIPS, and Smith Summit MIPS. Most of those helmets sport fairly flat brims, and the Line Miner Pro works well with those styles.

With the Smith Summit, a backcountry-focused helmet, I noticed a little gap. It was especially obvious at the corners of the temples where there is some downward curvature of the Line Miner Pro. But otherwise, I had a solid, seamless fit between helmet and goggles.

Noteworthy Field of View

Because the lenses only sport one layer instead of the usual two, Oakley claims the field of view has expanded by 20% compared to the original Line Miner.

This peripheral increase is incredibly significant on paper. On snow, though, the difference is a little more subtle. I didn’t really notice how much more field of view I had — just like I didn’t notice a lack of field of view when I swapped back to regular Line Miner.

However, I did notice the difference when I compared side by side. The gap between the fields of view was more apparent when I tried them on at the shop or compared the two on the hill. The peripherals are undoubtedly better in the Line Miner Pro. More expansive peripherals allow you to scan more terrain and keep an eye out for obstacles as you ride.

Less Distortion, Same Premium Prizm Optics

Another purported benefit of the single-layer lens system is a reduction in optical distortion. That would make sense, as traditional double-layer lenses have more opportunities to bounce, refract, and otherwise scramble light waves. This is a neat idea, especially because cylindrical lenses are more prone to distortion than their spherical or toric counterparts.

I don’t find myself lamenting optical distortion when I rock the original Line Miner. The layperson, unless an extreme goggle nerd, honestly won’t recognize a difference here. However, the optical distortion is on the low side for a cylindrical goggle, and the visuals felt clear and crisp. If you like the style of a cylindrical shape but want the optical precision of a spheric or toric shape, the Line Miner Pro should be at the top of your list.

The Line Miner Pro utilizes Oakley’s contrast-augmenting Prizm lens technology. I tested the Sage Gold lens for sunny-ish conditions and the Prizm Rose for low light, and the tints were right on the money. I wouldn’t have minded a darker lens with a lower VLT (visible light transmission) for truly glaring sunny days in Tahoe. But I loved these lenses, especially the Prizm Rose, on stormy, vertigo-inducing days.

Lens Interchangeability Security

I have had mixed experience with the Switchlock lens interchangeability system. It uses six magnetic attachment points and a pair of red locking mechanisms, one on each side of the goggle.

I’ll touch on my gripes with this system more below. But on the positive side, this system has a couple of things going for it — namely, lens security. Once you lock the lens in place, it’s not going anywhere.

Magnetic goggles like the Anon options have no locking mechanism at all. That makes it easier to squeeze the goggle frame and accidentally pop a lens free.

Or, in the event of a gnarly crash, your lenses could conceivably pop free upon impact. This is extraordinarily rare and not really a big consideration. If you have a goggle pop free upon impact, chances are you have other issues (e.g., hospital bills) to deal with.

Critiques: Lens Interchangeability System and Fogging

Lens Interchangeability Gripes

I wanted to love this lens interchangeability system, but, sadly, I didn’t. My issue isn’t with the magnets. Those are proven in offerings from Anon, Smith, and other competitors.

My issue is with the locking mechanisms. There are two red push tabs that are visible from both the inside and the outside of the goggles. The six sets of magnets suck the lens into place. Then, these red tabs fit around latches built into the lens itself.

To lock the goggle in place, you reach into the goggle frame and push the raised red tab until it sits flush with the interior of the frame, locking around the latch and securing the lens in place. To release the lens, you push the tab from the outside of the goggle frame until the latch disconnects. Then, the lens pops free.

When this system works, it works well. The connection between the lens and frame is secure. However, I dislike reaching into the goggle to push the red tab to release the lens. It’s hard to do with gloves on, let alone with mittens, and I worry about scratching the lenses. I haven’t, because I’m meticulous with goggles, but it is a concern.

Additionally, you can push the red tab in without catching the latch and start bombing a groomer at Mach 10, only to find a jet stream of air flowing into the corners of the lens. This didn’t happen frequently, and I’ve since learned to keep an eye out for this during changeovers. But it was my biggest frustration. 

Put it like this: If a baby can swap the lenses on a purely magnetic Anon, and a toddler can tackle Smith’s magnetic and mechanical locking system, the Oakley Line Miner Pro requires the IQ of a sixth grader. Not a straight-A student, mind you, but you get the picture.

Fogging Issues

Like any goggle nerd, my primary concern when reading the specs of the Line Miner Pro was fogging. Fog, after all, is a result of relatively warm moisture collecting on the cool surface of a frosty lens. Much like a double-pane window, double-layer lenses are known to reduce fogging by creating a thermally insulative barrier. Virtually all goggles you see on the market right now are double-layer.

So I was curious to see if Oakley’s gamble on an antifog-treated single-layer lens — essentially a blast from the past — would pay off.  The gains in the field of view and mitigation of optical distortion aren’t worth it, at least to me, if fogging increases.

So, did fogging increase with the Line Miner Pro? It’s honestly tough to say without lab testing. However, I experienced fog issues on three of 15 days, including one day that saw water droplets collecting on the upper brow. Every foggy moment had a clear impetus: either relentlessly wet weather, or I was bootpacking with a helmet on. These conditions and high-output activities, in my experience, can fog up any goggle.

I do continue to have some concerns here. I plan on exercising caution by pairing the goggles with a helmet that has brow venting, being conscientious of my balaclava positioning, and avoiding wearing them while hiking.

Who Is the Line Miner Pro For?

Despite the handful of honest critiques above, I believe the Line Miner Pro is a solid goggle. My biggest co-sign is that I’m currently wrapping up this article on the plane to Jackson Hole on a 10-day shred trip. The Line Miner Pro is the only pair of goggles I brought.

This goggle is not for people who swap lenses frequently and want their transitions to be as fast and stress-free as possible (look to Anon for that). It’s not for spherical or toric lens lovers. And it’s not for fog-fearing freeriders or anyone rocking a ventless dome piece, either.

In my opinion, the Line Miner Pro is for skiers and snowboarders who have always enjoyed Oakley’s top-tier style and Prizm optical clarity but who want to be able to swap, not just replace their lenses. It’s for shredders who love the vibe of cylindrical lenses but also care about lens minutiae, like minimal improvements in terms of optical distortion.

It’s for people like me, who have always been fans of Oakley and are stoked to see some innovation coming out of the optics heavyweight.

And if you do love the style, are loyal to double-layer lenses, but don’t care about changing lenses? Go with the original Line Miner. It’s still a stellar goggle, half the price, and my personal favorite goggle without a lens interchangeability system. 



Read the full article here

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button