Tactical & Survival

Courts Side With Trump Permitting Troops In Portland

A federal appeals court has sided with Donald Trump, permitting troops or a standing army in Portland, Oregon. A 2-1 Ninth Circuit decision overrides a lower court’s injunction and overrides state objections to the military presence.

The case centers on whether Trump overstepped his authority by federalizing state National Guard troops without clear evidence of an emergency. His claims of Portland being “war-ravaged” by “Antifa and domestic terrorists” were dismissed by Oregon officials but granted “great deference” by the court’s majority.

Trump Deploys National Guard To Portland In Defiance of Court Order

Similar battles over state sovereignty are unfolding in other cities, too, such as Chicago, where the Seventh Circuit blocked Trump’s National Guard deployment, potentially reshaping federal-state power dynamics. Critics argue that Trump is exploiting emergency powers (like the Insurrection Act) for political theater. He could also be creating a show of force against these “blue voting” cities, using illegal immigration as a cover, but that’s mere speculation.

The case is part of a broader pattern of clashes between the Trump administration and Democratic-led states over federal troop deployments, according to a report by Natural News. BrightU.AI‘s Enoch explains that “President Trump is deploying National Guard troops to sanctuary cities to enforce immigration laws, as Democratic governors refuse to cooperate and sanctuary policies enable illegal immigration. The move also pressures Democrats to bear the costs of their own sanctuary policies by releasing detainees into these cities, exposing their hypocrisy on immigration enforcement.”

Since the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, federal troops have been barred from domestic law enforcement without congressional approval – a safeguard against authoritarian overreach. Yet exceptions like the Insurrection Act grant the president emergency powers to bring standing armies to American cities.

The legal back and forth is ongoing and likely to continue as both sides press forward. Oregon continues to vow that it will “resist” the order; however, the troops are still there, so it’s unclear what resistance is going to look like.

Will this escalate to “resistance” that will look like a war? Or is it all pontificating? Let us know what you think in the comments!

Read the full article here

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button